smallbiab.jpg

The perils of a small majority

The Lib Dems got an unexpected flavour of their true predicament in the new Council on Tuesday.

They assumed that they would be able to change the Constitution at will (as per usual) as they wished to send the all-party Grants and Awards Panel into oblivion, keeping all say over major grants to the Voluntary Sector in the exclusive hands of the exclusively Liberal Democrat Executive.

One of their members didn't turn up and another went home early. The arithmetic was thus Lib Dems 23; Conservatives 21; Labour 2. The Conservatives and Labour voted together to preserve all-party involvement. One Lib Dem had a sufficiently open mind and strong conscience to abstain. So the vote was For the proposal 22; against 23; abstentions 1. And the mayor didn't even get to use her casting vote.

They also only managed to defeat by one vote a proposal from myself and David Edwards that new road scheme proposals should normally require a 40% consultation response rate and a majority thereof before proceeding. They seem to be happy to commit large sums with the support of only tiny numbers of citizens - and even to ignore the opposition of hundreds of citizens to their pet projects. This makes a farce of 'consultation' and brings the Council into disfavour with the public, but it keeps the highways officers and contractors busy, so I suppose they think it's OK.

 

No feedback has been posted yet.

Comment on this entry

Registered users may login here




Graphical Security Code


About me
Published and promoted by Paul Johnston Conservative Councillor for Surbiton Hill Ward in Kingston Upon Thames, UK
More about me
« February 2010 »
  • Su
  • Mo
  • Tu
  • We
  • Th
  • Fr
  • Sa
  • .
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • .
  • .
  • .
  • .
  • .
  • .