smallbiab.jpg

At the Guildhall at 7.30 this evening (28th February) the Council will set the Budget for the coming financial year. A further rise in Council Tax of about 4.99% is expected from the Liberal Democrat Administration.

Kingston will, thus, still have the highest Council Tax in London. 

The suggestion is made in a recent ‘Focus’ leaflet that this is all the Government’s fault. It is certainly true that, since 1997, the Labour government has used Council Tax in places like Kingston as one of Gordon Brown’s ’stealth taxes’. Our Lib Dem MP claims to be campaigning to get the Government to change its policy in this regard. Experience shows that there is no chance of that happening. To change the Government’s policy one will need to change the Government. We haven’t noticed much enthusiasm for a change of Government from his party since 1997.

The same FOCUS leaflet complains that Goverment will take nearly £6m from our Housing account this coming year to subsidise Council housing elsewhere. This means that 29p of every £1 collected from tenants in rent will go outside the Borough. This figure has risen by almost £2m since the tenants voted to 'stay with the Council' rather than support a large scale stock transfer (LSST), which would have kept this money in Kingston. Again Mr. Davey wants the Government to change its policy. Again this is a gesture rather than an action likely to be of any use. The Executive has refused to consider any other options since the rejection of LSST two years ago and the word has it that it has set its face against any further pursuit of LSST before the 2010 local election. So the situation will continue to dteriorate while the Lib Dem Executive and MP do no more than wring their hands.

 

Tesco thinks again!

The Property Director for Tesco, Mr. Patrick Stones, has written  informing councillors that Tesco has withdrawn its application on the Toby Jug and MOD site at Tolworth.

He says, “..I was particularly struck by comments…….that we had not sufficiently engaged the local community in developing our proposals………….I have therefore decided that we should stop and give local people the opportunity to be more involved in the development of this important location.” He adds “Whilst Tesco will remain a prominent feature of the scheme, I am prepared to consider a redesign of our plans, with your help.

He gives an email address for people who wish to be involved: tolworthconsultation@fd.com. Readers can access it from here.

This is an important concession from such a large company and I would wish to give credit to the efforts of my colleagues in Alexandra Ward, Cllrs. Ian George and Richard Hudson and all the many local traders in Surbiton Hill, Alexandra and Tolworth & Hook Rise wards who helped collect collect signatures for their petition.

 

Tesco thinks again!

The Property Director for Tesco, Mr. Patrick Stones, has written  informing councillors that Tesco has withdrawn its application on the Toby Jug and MOD site at Tolworth.

He says, “..I was particularly struck by comments…….that we had not sufficiently engaged the local community in developing our proposals………….I have therefore decided that we should stop and give local people the opportunity to be more involved in the development of this important location.” He adds “Whilst Tesco will remain a prominent feature of the scheme, I am prepared to consider a redesign of our plans, with your help.

He gives an email address for people who wish to be involved: tolworthconsultation@fd.com. Readers can access it from here.

This is an important concession from such a large company and I would wish to give credit to the efforts of my colleagues in Alexandra Ward, Cllrs. Ian George and Richard Hudson and all the many local traders in Surbiton Hill, Alexandra and Tolworth & Hook Rise wards who helped collect collect signatures for their petition.

 

Road accident in Ewell Road

This link to the Surrey Comet gives the story:                                                                       

car_wall_07_415957_full.jpg

http://www.surreycomet.co.uk/news/localnews/display.var.1198699.0.woman_hurt_as_car_crashes_into_wall.php

I have been contacted by the owner of the wall. It’s on the Ewell Road side of the junction between Kingsdowne Road and Ewell Road. He tells us there have been four accidents there and has asked for a safety fence to be erected to protect pedestrians from danger, especially as on this occasion a woman was sufficiently hurt to have to be  taken to hospital.

I have taken the matter up with the Highways Department and the neighbourhood Officers and Co-chairs. I would be grateful for comments from constituents and road users on this idea.

 

Residents deserve better than this....

default

I’m appalled and ashamed. I hope this and other examples of the artist’s work in School Lane have now been removed. The perpetrators can be challenged and their activities controlled. We did it 6 years ago with a zero tolerance policy on allowing graffiti to remain. I recall – as I was Environment Secretary in the then Cabinet – that we removed over 30000 sq.m. of graffiti in a few months and we had relative peace after that.

I thought there was a heightened police presence there recently too because of the ASB suffered by one of the residents. This should have provided a disincentive to this kind of behaviour.

But it’s all right really, you know. I saw Sir Ian Blair on the box earlier this evening congratulating himself on the falling crime rate in London. He must be Tony Blair’s cousin – and spinning runs in the family! We need a Rudi Giuliani over here – zero tolerance of petty criminality, because little criminality leads to bigger criminality later on. He made new York a better place. What price Livingstone doing something similar? Not a chance.


 
Current mood: Angry

About me
Published and promoted by Paul Johnston Conservative Councillor for Surbiton Hill Ward in Kingston Upon Thames, UK
More about me
« May 2008 »
  • Su
  • Mo
  • Tu
  • We
  • Th
  • Fr
  • Sa
  • .
  • .
  • .
  • .
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31